Staying Calm and Carrying On: Queen Elizabeth II's Resilience Framework for Leaders

Watch on YouTube  ·  1 min

On the 13th of June 1981, Queen Elizabeth II was riding down the Mall in central London for Trooping the Colour when six shots were fired at her from the crowd. They turned out to be blank cartridges, but in the moment, nobody knew that. The sound was unmistakable. The crowd scattered. Her horse, Burmese, shied violently.

The Queen steadied the horse. She patted Burmese, calmed her, and rode on. She completed the ceremony. She did not turn back. She did not cancel. She rode on.

I have shared this story with leadership audiences across many contexts, and the reaction is almost always the same: a moment of silence, and then the question - how? How do you do that? How, in a moment of genuine terror, do you find the composure to steady a frightened horse, orient yourself, and continue?

That question is the doorway into the most important aspect of Queen Elizabeth II's leadership: her resilience. Not the absence of difficulty, not immunity from fear or grief or doubt - but the deeply practised capacity to remain grounded, to hold the centre, when everything around her was in chaos.

The Annus Horribilis and the Year That Tested Everything

In November 1992, speaking at a Guildhall dinner to mark the fortieth anniversary of her accession, Queen Elizabeth II described that year in a single memorable phrase: annus horribilis. A horrible year. In one twelve-month period, three of her children's marriages had broken down publicly, Windsor Castle had suffered a devastating fire, and the monarchy's reputation had absorbed significant damage in the press and public perception.

What strikes me about that speech is not the admission of difficulty - that took courage enough - but what came after it. The Queen did not retreat. She did not pass the institution to others or reduce her presence until the storm passed. She stayed, and she continued to work, and she began - with characteristic patience and absolute discipline - the long process of rebuilding trust and modernising the monarchy's relationship with the public.

Resilience is not the absence of difficulty. It is the decision, made again each morning, to carry the weight without letting it define you or diminish your capacity to serve.

The years following 1992 were, in many ways, even harder. The separation and eventual divorce of Charles and Diana placed the Queen at the centre of the most scrutinised family breakdown in the world. Princess Diana's death in August 1997 created a moment of national grief that briefly threatened to become a moment of constitutional crisis, as public feeling about the monarchy's initial response ran intensely high. The Queen navigated all of it. She adapted. She returned to London. She spoke to the nation. She endured family betrayals that would have broken most people's professional lives entirely.

What Nelson Mandela Understood About Endurance

When I think about resilience at the level the Queen demonstrated it, my mind always goes to Nelson Mandela. Twenty-seven years in prison on Robben Island. Twenty-seven years of confinement, of having his freedom taken, of watching the world continue without him while he was reduced to breaking rocks in a quarry. And then emerging, in 1990, without apparent bitterness. Without the corrosive resentment that twenty-seven years of injustice would have produced in almost any other human being.

When Mandela was asked how he survived those years with his spirit intact, his answer was always some version of the same thing: he chose what he would allow to touch him. He could not choose his circumstances. He could choose his interior response to them. He decided who he would be within the confinement, and that decision - made not once but every single day - was the thing that preserved him.

I see the same interior architecture in the Queen. She could not choose the crises that came to her. She could not choose the family difficulties, the public pressures, the historical moments that required her steady presence. But she chose, consistently and consciously, to be the person her role required - composed, present, forward-facing - regardless of what was happening around her.

Stephen Hawking and the Fifty-Five Extra Years

Stephen Hawking was told at twenty-one years old that he had two years to live. Motor neurone disease, the doctors said. Two years, perhaps. He lived for another fifty-five. He produced some of the most significant theoretical physics of the twentieth century, wrote books read by millions, transformed how ordinary people understand the cosmos. He did all of this while losing, gradually and completely, every physical capacity he had.

Hawking once said that his illness, in a strange way, had liberated him - that confronting mortality so young had clarified everything that mattered and stripped away everything that did not. What remained was pure purpose, and that pure purpose sustained fifty-five years of extraordinary work that should, by any physiological measure, have been impossible.

The resilience that comes from confronting the worst - truly confronting it, not avoiding it or minimising it - and choosing to continue anyway, has a quality and a depth that no other form of resilience can replicate. The Queen confronted the worst, repeatedly, publicly, across seven decades. And she chose, every time, to continue.

Calm as Contagious - The Leader's Most Powerful Tool

One of the insights I share most often in my keynotes is this: a leader's emotional state is not a private matter. It is the single most contagious element of any team, organisation, or institution. When a leader panics, the people around them panic. When a leader is fractured, the team fragments. And when a leader is calm - genuinely, groundedly calm, not performing calm but actually holding the centre - that calm travels. It creates permission for others to be calm too.

The Queen understood this with extraordinary sophistication. In every public crisis, she was the steady point. Not expressionless - she was not a mask - but contained. The emotion was real and visible; the composure was genuine; and the combination told everyone watching: this is survivable. We will get through this. The institution holds.

I think of this principle now in every leadership context I encounter. When something goes wrong - a missed target, a team conflict, an unexpected setback - the leader's first job is not to solve the problem. It is to manage their own response to the problem, because that response is what every person in the room will absorb and mirror. Calm first. Solutions second.

A Resilience Framework for Practical Leadership

From the Queen's example - and from the study of Mandela and Hawking and others who have sustained extraordinary performance through extraordinary adversity - I have drawn a framework that I return to again and again:

Anchor to values, not to outcomes. The Queen's composure in crisis was possible because she was not primarily attached to results. She was attached to duty, to service, to the quality of her own conduct. When the outcomes are uncertain - and in a crisis they always are - values are the only reliable anchor. Know yours.

Process grief privately; lead publicly. This is a hard one, and it requires genuine support and genuine private processing. But the Queen demonstrated again and again that public leadership requires holding grief privately, not suppressing it, but processing it in spaces that are not the stage. It is a discipline, and it is learnable.

The composure you model is the composure others will find. Your team is watching you every moment of a crisis, not necessarily consciously, but they are reading your signals. You are setting the emotional temperature of the room. Be intentional about what temperature you set.

Resilience is rebuilt between crises, not during them. The Queen's capacity to recover was possible in part because of the renewal structures in her life - Balmoral, her dogs, her horses, her private faith. Resilience is not produced on demand. It is stored up in the spaces where you genuinely restore yourself.

The Mall, in June 1981. Six shots. A frightened horse. And a woman who steadied herself, steadied the horse, and rode on. That is the image I carry when things are difficult. Not as a demand for the impossible, but as a reminder that the composure to continue is almost always available to us, if we have built the foundation that makes it possible.