Watch on YouTube · 1 min
When I was a little girl in Sri Lanka, my grandmother spoke of the Queen the way you might speak of a gentle force of nature - with awe, with trust, with a certainty that she would always be there. "Don't worry," she told me, when I was preparing to travel 5,000 miles to the United Kingdom to build a new life. "The Queen will take care of you." My grandmother had never met Her Majesty. She had never stood in a receiving line or shaken a royal hand. But she believed in the Queen with the quiet certainty of someone who had watched, from the other side of the world, what a life devoted entirely to service looks like.
It was that belief that carried me across an ocean. And it was years later, as I sat down to research and write The Job Well Done, that I finally understood exactly what my grandmother had seen. The Queen was not simply a monarch. She was the most complete, most enduring, most living example of servant leadership I have ever encountered in my life.
The Three Words That Changed How I Think About Leadership
In June 2022, during the celebrations for her Platinum Jubilee - seventy years on the throne - Queen Elizabeth II sent a message to the Commonwealth. It was warm, characteristically restrained, full of gratitude. And it was signed: "Your Servant, Elizabeth R."
I have thought about those three words more than I have thought about most things in my professional life. Here was the most powerful woman in the Western world - a head of state, a head of the armed forces, a constitutional monarch who had sat with fifteen Prime Ministers, who had opened parliaments and received presidents and prime ministers and dignitaries from across the globe for seven decades - and she signed herself as a servant. Not a leader. Not a sovereign. A servant.
"Your Servant, Elizabeth R." - those three words contain an entire philosophy of leadership that most people spend their whole careers searching for.
I believe she meant it absolutely. That was the extraordinary thing. There was no irony in those words, no performance of humility designed to win affection. The Queen had genuinely, irreversibly, from the age of twenty-five, organised her entire existence around the question: who am I here to serve?
What Servant Leadership Actually Means - and What It Is Not
The term "servant leadership" was coined by Robert Greenleaf in 1970, but the practice is as old as human community. Its core proposition is simple and radical in equal measure: the leader exists for the benefit of those they lead, not the other way around. Power flows upward from the people, and the leader's job is to clear the path, not to walk along it in triumph.
What servant leadership is not - and this matters enormously - is weakness. It is not self-erasure. It is not saying yes to everything or performing endless sacrifice for an audience. The Queen was never any of those things. She had a spine of iron, standards she held without apology, and a clear sense of who she was and what she stood for. When President George W. Bush made an unfortunate gaffe at a state banquet, hinting at events from 1776, the Queen responded with perfect composure and a quiet wit that brought the room back to equilibrium without embarrassing her guest any further. That is not weakness. That is mastery.
True servant leadership requires extraordinary strength precisely because it demands that you consistently subordinate your own ego, your own preferences, your own comfort, to the wellbeing of those in your care. That is a far harder discipline than commanding from a position of authority.
Duty as a North Star
One of the things that struck me most deeply as I researched the Queen's life was the moment when duty replaced desire as her guiding principle. She was twenty-five years old. She had a young family, a husband she was devoted to, a life she had begun to build. And then, in a single morning in February 1952, everything changed. She climbed out of a treetop in Kenya, where she had been watching the wildlife with Philip, and came down a queen. Her father had died. The crown had passed to her while she was looking at an eagle soaring above the African plains.
From that day forward, her own wishes became secondary. Not irrelevant - she still had passions, preferences, pleasures - but secondary. Her compass was always oriented first toward duty, toward the people and the institution she had been entrusted to serve. That is a remarkable thing to watch across a seventy-year career, because it never wavered. The discipline was absolute.
I think about Mother Teresa in this context, who said, "If you are humble, nothing will touch you, neither praise nor disgrace, because you know what you are." The Queen embodied that. She was not pursuing recognition or legacy in the conventional sense. She was simply doing the job, every day, with complete commitment.
The Global Language of Service
When I look across the landscape of exceptional leaders - the people I reference in The Job Well Done because their lives illuminate something essential about leadership - I see servant leadership expressed in many different forms.
Roger Federer's extraordinary longevity in tennis was built not on dominance for its own sake but on a profound respect for the game itself, for the fans, for the history of the sport. Bill Gates, through the Gates Foundation, redirected one of the world's largest fortunes entirely toward the service of global health - a choice that asks the same question the Queen asked: not what do I want, but who do I serve?
But none of them did it for seventy years, publicly, with no retirement option, from the moment they woke until they slept. That is what makes the Queen's example so singular. She did not have a phase of servant leadership followed by a phase of personal fulfilment. It was all one thing. Service was her life, and her life was fully and completely lived.
Performative Versus Authentic Service
We live in an era of what I think of as performative servant leadership - leaders who have read the research, absorbed the vocabulary, and know how to speak the language of service while their actual decisions are made entirely in service of themselves. The tell is always in the specifics: where does the credit go? Who gets blamed when things go wrong? Whose names appear in the announcement, and whose do not?
The Queen never took credit that was not hers. She deflected it constantly, redirecting attention toward others, toward causes, toward the people doing the actual work in communities and organisations across the Commonwealth. She praised publicly and, when necessary, addressed concerns entirely privately. She never aired grievances through the press. She never orchestrated sympathy campaigns. She simply continued to work.
Authentic servant leadership is not what you say about yourself. It is the pattern of your choices, accumulated across years.
That is a discipline that almost nobody fully achieves, because it requires something our culture actively discourages: the willingness to be underestimated, to let your work speak without amplification, to trust that the quality of your service will eventually be seen.
The Question That Changes Everything
The practical application I take from the Queen's servant leadership philosophy is a single question that I have begun asking myself every morning, and that I share with every leadership audience I address: Who am I serving today?
It sounds simple. It is not. Most of us, if we are honest, spend the majority of our working day serving our own interests - our performance metrics, our reputation, our anxiety about what others think of us, our desire to be seen as capable and valuable. There is nothing shameful in that. It is entirely human. But it means that true service - the kind the Queen practised - is actually a radical reorientation of the self.
When you ask "Who am I serving today?" with genuine intent, the answer changes your decisions. You walk into a meeting differently. You listen differently. You make choices about where to put your time and energy that would look quite different if you were primarily asking "How do I look today?" or "What will advance my position today?"
I am not suggesting that personal ambition is wrong - it is not. Leaders need drive and direction. But when service becomes the organising principle, ambition finds its proper place: as fuel for the mission, not as the mission itself.
A Legacy Built on Service
When Queen Elizabeth II died in September 2022, millions of people around the world - many of whom had never met her, many of whom lived in countries that had complex histories with the British Crown - felt a grief that surprised them. My grandmother, who had trusted the Queen from half a world away, would not have been surprised at all.
What people mourned, I think, was not the monarch. It was the example. It was the proof, held before the world for seventy years, that a life of genuine service was possible. That someone could hold extraordinary power and use it, consistently, for others. That "Your Servant, Elizabeth R." could mean exactly what it said.
That is the inheritance she left. And it is available to every leader, in every role, at every scale - from the CEO to the team leader to the parent to the volunteer. The title matters very little. The question is always the same: who are you serving?
Explore all nine dimensions of the Queen's leadership philosophy - from servant leadership to resilience to legacy - in The Job Well Done.